Is it just me, or are govt. emails practically undecipherable?
I got one from the California Air Resources Board (ARB) a few days ago, saying it’s having a meeting to discuss “development of the federal 8-hour ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) attainment plans.”
What the hell are “federal 8-hour ozone and fine particulate matter attainment plans”? For that matter, what’s “PM 2.5″?
One thing’s clear from the email: A meeting’s happening on Oct. 12 in Sacramento to discuss this stuff. What’s unclear is what it’s about and whether or not the public’s invited.
After much head scratching and internet research, this is what I’ve gathered:
As a part of the Clean Air Rules of 2004, the EPA needs to make sure specific air quality standards are being met at the state level. Two of these are the “8-hour ozone” and “PM 2.5” standards.
The 8-hour ozone thing basically monitors ground-level ozone (which can cause serious health problems including harmful effects on visibility and ecological functions) levels for 8-hour periods. The PM2.5 thing monitors teeny pollutants in the air (fine particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter), which’ve been associated with premature mortality among other serious health effects.
Both those levels have to be kept under a threshold. Cali didn’t meet this threshold for 8-hour ozone OR the PM2.5, so we need to send in State Implementation Plans (SIPs) — plans for how we’re gonna get under the threshold — to the EPA in 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Which is why we’re having the meeting, aka symposium. There, ARB staff will compare Cali’s emission-reduction standards to federal standards, outline how those standards might be met using current science, then discuss the options and strategies that California might employ to reduce emissions to meet these standards.
And After the meeting, the ARB staff will propose a final strategy at a public meeting in Spring 2007.
Whew! At least ARB let me know I can contact Carol Sutkus of ARB’s Planning and Technical Support Division at 916.322.1229 or csutkus@arb.ca.gov with more Qs. I’ve duly left her a message, asking whether the public’s invited to this meeting and if a location and time’s been decided on yet.
Below’s the body of the email, just to illustrate how hard the thing is to decipher:
___
On October 12, 2006, Air Resources Board (ARB) staff will hold a symposium in Sacramento to discuss development of the federal
8-hour ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) attainment plans. A meeting notice and further information will be sent out prior to the meeting.
The focus of the symposium will be to outline the State’s standing in relation to the federal standards, what current science is telling us it will take to meet the standards, and discuss the statewide strategy under development to find the emission reductions needed to demonstrate attainment of the standards. At the symposium, ARB staff will discuss options under consideration to reduce emissions from sources under State and federal control, including sources addressed in the Air Resources Board’s Goods Movement Emission Reduction Strategy and Diesel Risk Reduction Plan.
The State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 are due to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2007 and 2008 respectively. ARB staff will propose a final strategy before an ARB public meeting in the Spring of 2007 at which the Board will consider the proposal as an addition to the California SIP.
If you have any questions or need more information, please contact Carol Sutkus of ARB’s Planning and Technical Support Division at (916) 322-1229 or csutkus@arb.ca.gov.
Update, 9/3/06: Carol called me back! Yes, the meeting’s open to the public — no reservation necessary. The event’ll likely run from 9 am - 5 pm at 1001 I St. in Sacramento, and will also be webcast for those who can’t be there. More info about the webcasting addy and the exact times to come –
Tags: air, california, environment, pollution, arb, epa