<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clicklist: Green celebrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenlagirl.com/2007/09/28/clicklist-green-celebrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenlagirl.com/2007/09/28/clicklist-green-celebrity/</link>
	<description>Urban environmental lifestyle blog in Los Angeles</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/2007/09/28/clicklist-green-celebrity/#comment-131113</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2007/09/28/clicklist-green-celebrity/#comment-131113</guid>
		<description>Having been born and raised in the City of New Orleans, and having been personally effected by the devestation of the hurricane... i can still strongly say that building eco-homes in the lower 9th ward is the worst backwards idea i have read yet. To build eco-sustainable homes in an area that is swamp land quickly eroding, constantly flooding, and guaranteed to be destroyed over and over, seems like an oxy-moron to me.  I understand the giving nature of his plan, and the beauty of doing it the right way(eco safe) - but this is the wrong place. Unless those houses can double as getaway boats, and resist the continued sinking of the land....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been born and raised in the City of New Orleans, and having been personally effected by the devestation of the hurricane&#8230; i can still strongly say that building eco-homes in the lower 9th ward is the worst backwards idea i have read yet. To build eco-sustainable homes in an area that is swamp land quickly eroding, constantly flooding, and guaranteed to be destroyed over and over, seems like an oxy-moron to me.  I understand the giving nature of his plan, and the beauty of doing it the right way(eco safe) - but this is the wrong place. Unless those houses can double as getaway boats, and resist the continued sinking of the land&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
