My other thought is that “big up” is more often used as a noun, as in “giving big ups to…” Similar to giving a “shout out” or props (or even “mad props”).

Anyway, I’d suggest you consider the audience for your postings - LA Times readers who are unlikely to be young or “hip”. If they don’t understand your posts, your potential positive suggestions will be unheeded.

A blog should be understood by its intended audience–not necessarily everyone, of course, but by the people the author is trying to reach. I think the copy editor is struggling with the fact that the LAT usually writes for an extremely broad audience who won’t be familiar with some of those phrases.

Although clarity is a very important concern for good writing, no less important is that it should be fun to read! Which is exactly why I read your blog.

The thing is, just about all writing should have a voice–even news writing. News coverage is supposed to be balanced, not boring. Frankly, even good technical editors have a voice. That’s why the Dummies books are so successful and distinct.

Clarity’s ONE concern. But no one actually enjoys reading a direction manual, even if it’s very clear. And I’m not writing a fucking myspace profile.

Kate — Talk up, I agree, would’ve been a more appropriate suggestion –

Meanwhile, I’ve never heard “big up,” but knew exactly what you meant by it. Maybe the L.A. Times would be more highly regarded if they started with the assumption that their readers can read.

I just don’t think I need to sound like a copyeditor to get my point across.