After reading all of the below, my general conclusion is that Tetrapaks are not particularly less sustainable than all the other packaging we use — but that a lot of the packaging we use is seriously unsustainable.
>> Tetrapak’s pluses: Less energy wasted on refrigeration, less food wasted on spoilage, less fuel wasted in transport compared to heavier packaging, less space taken up in landfills than other containers.
>> Tetrapak’s minuses: Even when recycled, tetrapak’s downcycled as a lot of the materials can’t be reused. All the paper fiber comes from trees, not recycled paper, because new fibers are needed to make the containers strong. The stuff’s rather complicated and arguably expensive to recycle.
>> Natural Life magazine has, IMHO, the most balanced take on the Tetrapak issue.
>> The popular green blog Treehugger has vocal bloggers on both sides of the issue, with one calling Tetrapak “the most elaborate greenwashing scheme ever,” and another dedicating a post to defending TetraPak. Treehugger also reports Tetrapak’s embraced FSC-certification for the paper portion of its packaging — in some European countries.
>> Green biz blog TriplePundit‘s also taken up the Tetrapak issue.
>> Many local cities, including Santa Monica and West Hollywood, collect Tetrapacks for recycling.
Do you use Tetrapak? Opt for it over other types of packaging? Why or why not?
Photo by Tetra Pak


>> NRDC’s 
