What happens when California’s landmark legislation to address global climate change meets green digital media? Find out at the next BREATHE LA Green Salon panel — titled “AB 32.0 and the Rise of Green Digital Media” — on which I’ll be a panelist!

When: Tues., March 16, 9 am – 10:30 am
Where: California Endowment Center, 1000 N. Alameda St., Los Angeles
Cost: Free with RSVP

The other panelists are Fuel’s Josh Tickell, Jennifer Gooding of EcoTuesday, Nicole Hansen of The Green Blog Network, and CEO of Veggie Van Organization Rebecca Harnell. Ray Gonzales, BREATHE LA Board Member and former Channel 5 KTLA host, will moderate.

I hope to see you there! Coffee and a light breakfast will be served to sweeten and caffeinate the discussion.

BREATHE LA’s a local environmental nonprofit that works to improve air quality and lung health in Los Angeles. This panel will be the first of of five in Breathe LA’s series of panels dubbed “Green Streets of LA,” which explore “how our community is rising up to address sustainable solutions as they relate to California’s landmark legislation, AB 32 Global Warming Act.” Future panels will discuss greening everything from the ports to hospitals.

Image via BREATHE LA

0 Comments

You voted for them — or voted against them only to see them get elected anyway. Either way, since they took office, your members of Congress have been voting for or against the environment in Washington D.C.

Now, your members of Congress are getting graded on their eco votes by the League of Conservation Voters. Yesterday, the LCV released its 2009 National Environmental Scorecard, revealing scores in the first session of the 111th Congress.

How were the senators and House members graded? The League looked at 11 Senate and 13 House votes on environmental issues like clean energy, climate change, and water and wildlife conservation. When your elected official voted on the side of the environment, their scores went up. When they didn’t, scores dropped.

I feel pretty lucky: Both my California senators, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, and my Representative Henry Waxman, earned perfect 100% scores in 2009. Many members of Congress, however, scored a lot lower — with quite a few, including 9 Californian members of the House — scoring a 0%.

Find out how your members of Congress scored by checking the Scorecard.

0 Comments

>> First, for alt fuel newbies unclear as to what’s wrong with corn ethanol exactly: Catch up by reading an oldie but a goodie — Rolling Stone’s “The Ethanol Scam: One of America’s Biggest Political Boondoggles.” You can also watch Fuel – or read my review.

>> Now that you know the environmental and farming-related problems behind ethanol, you might understand why a Cali regional panel doesn’t want more ethanol fueling stations. The Southern California Association of Governments “turned down nearly $11 million in federal stimulus dollars targeted to build 55 ethanol fueling stations across Southern California.” This issue’s still a somewhat controversial one among environmentalists though.

>> The current debate over fuels in California has a lot to do with our tough global warming mitigation law, a.k.a. AB 32, and how best to meet its requirements. That law is under attack, by the way — by a group that wants to block it from being implemented until California’s unemployment drops below 5.5% for four consecutive quarters. Despite the fact that such a move would block efforts to create new green jobs, the anti AB 32-ers wanted to put it on the ballot as “California Jobs Initiative.” California Attorney General Jerry Brown renamed it “Suspends air pollution control laws requiring major polluters to report and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.” Yay Jerry!

>> Unfortunately, the U.S. EPA’s embraced ethanol — as well as “clean coal” and nuclear power. Writes Tom Philpott at Grist: “The Obama EPA has signed off on the absurd, abysmal Renewable Fuel Standard established under Bush a couple of years ago—ensuring that farmers will continue to devote vast swaths of land to GHG-intensive corn, of which huge portion of will ultimately be set aflame to power cars—but not before being transformed into liquid fuel in an energy-intensive process.”

Image via thefuelfilm.com

0 Comments

The Copenhagen Climate Talks closed last week with the sinking hopes of many enviro-groups who, expectedly, called the summit a failure — and with a “sinking” mural by world-renowned graffiti artist Banksy.

“I don’t believe in global warming,” reads Banksy’s new mural — with the bottoms of the letters painted below the water, as if sinking in disbelief. That message is one of four new Banksy works painted on the Regent’s Canal in Camden, north London, according to the BBC. (via Social Vibe)

Not sure what exactly went down in Copenhagen? Fellow MNN blogger Karl Burkhart’s post has skinny on the Copenhagen Accord, the non legally or politically binding agreement with no real timeline many enviro groups are upset about.

But don’t despair — The fight isn’t over yet. Ken Ward at Grist notes that although the Copenhagen Accord is basically “utterly useless language, unenthusiastically scrabbled together in hours by 5 out of 192 nations,” a few good things basically came out of it — namely, global acceptance of the fact of global warming, and the fear and clarity that we really need to start working to mitigate global climate change. NRDC’s Jake Schmidt is hopeful that the Accord will be “further fleshed out in the coming months.” And Geoffrey Lean of London’s Daily Telegraph goes so far as to outline 7 steps that need to be taken as we work toward a real, binding international climate deal.

Sign up at 350.org to stay on top of the news and keep fighting for a fair, ambitious and legally binding agreement.

Earlier:
>> Stay an eco-activist after Blogger Beach Cleanup — and the Copenhagen Accord
>> Disillusioned in but hopeful after Copenhagen
>> Californians in Copenhagen

Photo by unusualimage

0 Comments

Here’s what Californians are doing at the Copenhagen Climate Summit, which is now in its second and final week:

>> Cali Governor Schwarzenegger spoke to the crowd at Copenhagen, urging the U.N. to host a climate summit not for countries, but for cities, states, provinces, and regions. And he’d like said summit to happen in California.

>> Grist’s Amanda Little calls Schwarzenegger’s comments “a shockingly defeatist speech tricked out with sunny language about private-sector innovation”:

In an attempt to raise spirits, the Governator lowered expectations: failing in Copenhagen won’t discredit all the amazing progress that’s happening at state and local levels…. For a guy who was introduced by Canadian premier Gordon Campbell as “a climate action hero for the globe,” the Governor’s comments reflect staggeringly low expectations for the officials at Copenhagen.

>> The L.A. Times reports that Copenhagen’s full of “hundreds, if not thousands, of Californians — the governor, as well as the mayor of Los Angeles, academic superstars and green tech gurus, environmentalists and college students”:

None of the Californians, however, are involved in the actual negotiations: Those are led by diplomats behind closed doors…. But that’s not the point. At hundreds of side panels, conferences, receptions, and exhibits, everyone who is anyone in the world of carbon control gets a chance to rub shoulders with other players.

Earlier: Disillusioned in but hopeful after Copenhagen

0 Comments

The general consensus among the respected enviro experts seems to be that the negotiations in Copenhagen won’t actually save us from climate disaster — but that there’s reason to be hopeful post-Copenhagen.

>> Why are Copenhagen negotiations flawed? As 350.org founder Bill McKibben pointed out, the nations are negotiating a political deal for a middle-of-the-road consensus — that’s likely to fall far short of what science demands as a response to global climate change.

>> Climate scientist James Hansen agrees, going so far as to say that it’d be better if Copenhagen climate talks collapsed, because a half-assed agreement would give the false impression that we’ve “solved” a problem. (via Good Human)

James Hansen, the world’s pre-eminent climate scientist, said any agreement likely to emerge from the negotiations would be so deeply flawed that it would be better to start again from scratch.

In Hansen’s view, dealing with climate change allows no room for the compromises that rule the world of elected politics. “This is analagous to the issue of slavery faced by Abraham Lincoln or the issue of Nazism faced by Winston Churchill,” he said. “On those kind of issues you cannot compromise. You can’t say let’s reduce slavery, let’s find a compromise and reduce it 50% or reduce it 40%.”

>> No Logo author Naomi Klein also agrees that there’s little hope in Copenhagen. In an interview with UpTakeVideo, Naomi says the official negotiations at the conference “creates an illusion of having addressed a dire crisis” that has yet to be adequately addressed.

She does sound optimistic about what activists will demand from their governments post-Copenhagen, pointing out that since economic and trade policy groups are now also working on environmental issues due to sheer necessity, the numbers of people pushing for change have automatically doubled.

>> On a slightly more optimistic note, Geoffrey Lean points out in Grist that countries are making emissions cutting pledges that far surpass past expectations. Of course, “the pledges do not yet add up to enough to avert dangerous climate change.” Hmmm….

What’s clear is that the fight to avert climate change won’t even come close to ending with Copenhagen, regardless of whether or not the negotiations are declared a “success.”

4 Comments

>> The climate talks will be a disaster, says 350.org founder Bill McKibben — if we negotiate in the politics-as-usual manner instead of the physics-doesn’t-lie manner:

What I’m saying is: even the best politicians are treating the problem of climate change as a normal political one, where you halve the distance between various competing interests and do your best to reach some kind of consensus that doesn’t demand too much of anyone, yet reduces the political pressure for a few years — at which time, of course, you (or possibly someone entirely different) will have to deal with it again….

Physics has set an immutable bottom line on life as we know it on this planet…. And here’s the thing: physics doesn’t just impose a bottom line, it imposes a time limit…. It’s like nothing we’ve ever faced before — and we’re facing it as if it’s just like everything else. That’s the problem.

>> Connie Hedegaard, Minister for the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen 2009, sounds more optimistic. Granted, that’s sort of her job — I guess it would be odd if the Minister said talks are unlikely to be productive or meaningful….

In any case — In a post for the official COP15 blog, Connie writes that striking an international deal is “not easy” but “doable”:

Over the last weeks, countries have come forward almost on a daily basis. Norway will cut emissions by 40 % in 2020. South Korea will deviate with 30 % from business as usual. Russia has stepped up its commitment and will now reduce by up to 25 %. And then there is Brazil, Japan, Indonesia, and Mexico.

President Obama has announced US targets, not only for 2020, but maybe more noticeable for 2025 and 2030. 4 percent below 1990 might not be what the world has been hoping for, but the US seems to know that the price for coming late is that the pathway for reductions after 2020 will be extra steep with 18 % below 1990-levels in 2025 and 32 percent in 2030.

It is also new and very encouraging that China comes forward internationally. We must analyse more carefully what the new Chinese announcement translates to when it comes to a percentage for deviation from business as usual.

>> Can’t keep track of what country’s agreed to what eco-goals? The Wall Street Journal’s put together a handy map. (via Earth2Tech)

>> Grist’s put together Copenhagen Climate Talks site, What the føck is going on in Copenhagen. The articles aren’t as funny as the title, but are more informative….

>> You can also follow the COP15 blog and the Climate News page at TckTckTck to stay on top of the latest Copenhagen news.

Earlier:
>> Copenhagen Climate Talks begin!
>> Cutting through the confusion over Copenhagen Climate Talks

0 Comments

>> The Copenhagen Climate Talks begin today — and 56 newspapers in 45 countries printed the same editorial this morning. Dubbed “Fourteen days to seal history’s judgment on this generation,” the editorial calls for action from world leaders on climate change marking the start of Copenhagen. The Miami Herald was the only U.S. paper that agreed to sign on.

>> Finally, the U.S. EPA’s determined that greenhouse gases are bad news for our collective future. From the New York Times:

The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday will complete its determination that greenhouse gases pose a danger to human health and the environment, paving the way for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles, power plants, factories refineries and other major sources.

>> Obama has changed his schedule; he’ll now be attending the last day of the Copenhagen Climate Talks — “a notable increase in commitment (and political exposure) from the administration,” according to Dave Roberts at Grist.

>> A sustainable fashion show sent Danish eco-couture designs down the runway at Copenhagen last weekend.

Earlier: Cutting through the confusion over Copenhagen Climate Talks

0 Comments

Does the phrase “cap and trade” made you twitch — because you still don’t quite understand what it means although you’ve heard it so often you know it must be something you should know?

Annie Leonard of The Story of Stuff-fame’s got your back.

The Story of Cap & Trade from Story of Stuff Project on Vimeo.

Annie’s returned with The Story of Cap & Trade, which explains both what cap & trade is — and why it’s unlikely to work the way its proponents say it will. If long articles explaining the ins and outs of carbon trading have always put you to sleep, this quick and dirty video will let you figure things out once and for all — and start participating in cocktail conversations about cap and trade — then start engaging in eco-activism to push for more meaningful solutions to our climate crisis.

2 Comments

If you, like me, signed up at BeyondTalk.net to engage in peaceful civil disobedience to demand strong action to combat climate change — then I hope you live in one of these 9 cities: Chicago, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Burlington, VT, two cities in Maine, and Washington DC.

Otherwise, you, like me, are relegated to distant voyeur status for the International Day of Action for Climate Change, a.k.a. N30, when activists are marking the 10th anniversary of the Seattle World Trade Organization protests by taking to the streets “to demand equitable, democratic and science-based solutions to climate change.”

Today’s actions are going after energy companies and big banks: Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Chevron, BP, or American Electric Power. All those companies have stymied efforts to push a progressive agenda to combat climate change, whether by directly producing a huge carbon footprint through their business practices, financing dirty energy companies, weakening carbon trading or tax laws, or lobbying against regulation that would combat climate change.

Environmental concerns and social justice activism are converging for this day of action, as global climate change often tends to disproportionately affect the already-underprivileged. Live in any of those 9 cities? It’s not too late to join in the day of action! Get the details behind N30 Actions, and simply show up at the action happening near you.

Feeling left out, like me? Then start planning a “Vigil For Survival,” eco-activist grassroots events happening across the world on Fri., Dec. 12 and Sat., Dec. 13. Organized by 350.org (the group also behind the International Day of Climate Action — of which Blogger Beach Cleanup was one organized event) and other eco-action groups, these evening vigils are being held about half way through the Copenhagen Climate Talks “in solemn solidarity with the nations and peoples for whom delay on climate action could mean extinction” to “send a clear message to world leaders deciding the fate of the planet’s future.”

Only a few vigils — happening in Westchester and El Segundo — are registered in the L.A. area so far (see map) — so here’s your chance to organize one in your community. I’ll write more about local actions for Vigil For Survival as we get closer to the date.

Earlier: Stay an eco-activist after Blogger Beach Cleanup!

Images via actforclimatejustice.org and 350.org

0 Comments