<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clicklist: Slow down and make less mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/</link>
	<description>Urban environmental lifestyle blog in Los Angeles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siel</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-44324</link>
		<dc:creator>Siel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2007/01/18/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/#comment-44324</guid>
		<description>Sure! Thanks for dropping by :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure! Thanks for dropping by :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue-dot-green</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-44071</link>
		<dc:creator>blue-dot-green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2007/01/18/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/#comment-44071</guid>
		<description>The World Vision Gifts and their soccer ball program, seem like a great Idea! Thanks for sharing the video -P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The World Vision Gifts and their soccer ball program, seem like a great Idea! Thanks for sharing the video -P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siel</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-43837</link>
		<dc:creator>Siel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2007/01/18/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/#comment-43837</guid>
		<description>I totally agree -- Freud&#039;s interesting to study with a cultural impact perspective. Sadly, some of Freud&#039;s theories are still bought wholesale (for ex, feminist film theory is inexplicably attached to Freud&#039;s theories about fetishes). The practice seems so ingrained that people don&#039;t even ask WHY they&#039;re using these theories or if they&#039;re even appropriate or effective --

Thus ended my flirtation with feminist film theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree &#8212; Freud&#8217;s interesting to study with a cultural impact perspective. Sadly, some of Freud&#8217;s theories are still bought wholesale (for ex, feminist film theory is inexplicably attached to Freud&#8217;s theories about fetishes). The practice seems so ingrained that people don&#8217;t even ask WHY they&#8217;re using these theories or if they&#8217;re even appropriate or effective &#8211;</p>
<p>Thus ended my flirtation with feminist film theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don hosek</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-43644</link>
		<dc:creator>don hosek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2007/01/18/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/#comment-43644</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found people who still followed Freud to be an odd bunch. It&#039;s not just that he doctored his results, but that there are better explanations of his findings possible through behavioralism.

That said, given the &lt;i&gt;cultural&lt;/i&gt; impact, it does make sense to take Freudian ideas into account in literary criticism (although I think that the validity is not there in works written before Freud&#039;s influence had grown). The model to use would be to take into consideration, Christian doctrine in writing criticism of Milton or Graham Greene.

Although writing this, I can see a case made for Freudian analysis of, say Shakespeare, not because it&#039;s a valid model for Shakespeare, but because it provides some insight into how Shakespeare may have helped shape Freud&#039;s ideas.

When I got my BA in English, there were no Freudians that I was aware of in the English faculty. Mostly we were dominated by New Critics, and to a lesser extent deconstructionist theory. Me, I tended more towards a hermeneutic analysis with a touch of Marxism. Until I had my intellectual crisis: I could see why I would want to write literature, and I could see why I would want to write critical theory, but criticism itself seemed to be devoid of a purpose (and simultaneously was the bulk of what I was doing). Needless to say, this was disastrous to my continuation as a literary scholar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found people who still followed Freud to be an odd bunch. It&#8217;s not just that he doctored his results, but that there are better explanations of his findings possible through behavioralism.</p>
<p>That said, given the <i>cultural</i> impact, it does make sense to take Freudian ideas into account in literary criticism (although I think that the validity is not there in works written before Freud&#8217;s influence had grown). The model to use would be to take into consideration, Christian doctrine in writing criticism of Milton or Graham Greene.</p>
<p>Although writing this, I can see a case made for Freudian analysis of, say Shakespeare, not because it&#8217;s a valid model for Shakespeare, but because it provides some insight into how Shakespeare may have helped shape Freud&#8217;s ideas.</p>
<p>When I got my BA in English, there were no Freudians that I was aware of in the English faculty. Mostly we were dominated by New Critics, and to a lesser extent deconstructionist theory. Me, I tended more towards a hermeneutic analysis with a touch of Marxism. Until I had my intellectual crisis: I could see why I would want to write literature, and I could see why I would want to write critical theory, but criticism itself seemed to be devoid of a purpose (and simultaneously was the bulk of what I was doing). Needless to say, this was disastrous to my continuation as a literary scholar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-43642</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2007/01/18/clicklist-slow-down-and-make-less-mistakes/#comment-43642</guid>
		<description>Siel, did you get my e-mail or call? I&#039;m sick, realllll bad. You can delete this comment after you see this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siel, did you get my e-mail or call? I&#8217;m sick, realllll bad. You can delete this comment after you see this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

