Comments on: Gore’s still green http://greenlagirl.com/gores-still-green/ Urban environmental lifestyle blog in Los Angeles Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:25:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Siel http://greenlagirl.com/gores-still-green/comment-page-1/#comment-11227 Siel Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:04:07 +0000 http://greenlagirl.com/2006/08/18/gores-still-green/#comment-11227 I think even Starbucks rejected USA Today -- they used to sell 'em a while back. Customers weren't buying them, according to Major of Starbucks -- I think even Starbucks rejected USA Today — they used to sell ‘em a while back. Customers weren’t buying them, according to Major of Starbucks –

]]> By: Fletch http://greenlagirl.com/gores-still-green/comment-page-1/#comment-11036 Fletch Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:53:15 +0000 http://greenlagirl.com/2006/08/18/gores-still-green/#comment-11036 U.S.A. Today long, long, long ago became a paper I enjoy wiping my ass with. Thanks for letting us in on an example of the daily confusion regarding global warming. U.S.A. Today long, long, long ago became a paper I enjoy wiping my ass with.

Thanks for letting us in on an example of the daily confusion regarding global warming.

]]> By: EcoLarry http://greenlagirl.com/gores-still-green/comment-page-1/#comment-11007 EcoLarry Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:55:46 +0000 http://greenlagirl.com/2006/08/18/gores-still-green/#comment-11007 Thanks for posting this Siel. I've re-posted it at my Care2.com network. Keep up the great green work! ~Peace, Larry Thanks for posting this Siel. I’ve re-posted it at my Care2.com network. Keep up the great green work! ~Peace, Larry

]]> By: Alotta Errata http://greenlagirl.com/gores-still-green/comment-page-1/#comment-11006 Alotta Errata Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:35:46 +0000 http://greenlagirl.com/2006/08/18/gores-still-green/#comment-11006 Great. And do you think USA Today will publish an article of equal size and placement clearing up the whole issue? Of course not.. because "they" weren't wrong, and it was just an "opinion" piece. While I'm all for opinion and freedom of speech, an opinion piece isn't an opinion piece if it is based on "facts" that are false. ugh. Great. And do you think USA Today will publish an article of equal size and placement clearing up the whole issue? Of course not.. because “they” weren’t wrong, and it was just an “opinion” piece. While I’m all for opinion and freedom of speech, an opinion piece isn’t an opinion piece if it is based on “facts” that are false.

ugh.

]]>