<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is GreenPan a safe alternative to toxic Teflon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/</link>
	<description>Urban environmental lifestyle blog in Los Angeles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Siel</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/comment-page-1/#comment-401427</link>
		<dc:creator>Siel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=4271#comment-401427</guid>
		<description>Lex sent me a couple links to a McDougall article about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2006nl/april/teflon.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Teflon&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drmcdougall.com/med_hot_vegetableoils.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fat&lt;/a&gt;, and I dutifully read them. Here was my response to Lex: 

Lex -- Thanks for the links. I&#039;m actually wondering if you read them yourself, because your comment on my blog seems rather off base, even if one&#039;s a fan of McDougall. For one, you&#039;ll notice that his assessment of the dangers of Teflon relies very heavily on the research done by Dupont itself -- hardly a reliable source. He also conveniently ignores all the research that HAS shown that Teflon is dangerous -- including the EWG findings that I mention in the post.

That aside -- McDougall actually says at the end of the article: &quot;we still recommend the use of iron, stainless steel and copper cookware.&quot; This makes your diatribe against oils odd indeed, since the very cookware recommended by McDougall still requires oil.

Everyone knows obesity and its related diseases are a problem in the U.S. -- but most nutritionists and scientists would agree that that&#039;s due to overeating unhealthy foods (including, to McDougall&#039;s credit, excessive fats and oils) and sedentary lifestyle, not &quot;oil poisoning.&quot; Your strange assertion that &quot;No fat is a good fat,&quot; however, gives me the sense that you&#039;re more into strange fringe food &quot;scientists&quot; than reliable, proven scientific and nutritional research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex sent me a couple links to a McDougall article about <a href="http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2006nl/april/teflon.htm" rel="nofollow">Teflon</a> and <a href="http://www.drmcdougall.com/med_hot_vegetableoils.html" rel="nofollow">fat</a>, and I dutifully read them. Here was my response to Lex: </p>
<p>Lex &#8212; Thanks for the links. I&#8217;m actually wondering if you read them yourself, because your comment on my blog seems rather off base, even if one&#8217;s a fan of McDougall. For one, you&#8217;ll notice that his assessment of the dangers of Teflon relies very heavily on the research done by Dupont itself &#8212; hardly a reliable source. He also conveniently ignores all the research that HAS shown that Teflon is dangerous &#8212; including the EWG findings that I mention in the post.</p>
<p>That aside &#8212; McDougall actually says at the end of the article: &#8220;we still recommend the use of iron, stainless steel and copper cookware.&#8221; This makes your diatribe against oils odd indeed, since the very cookware recommended by McDougall still requires oil.</p>
<p>Everyone knows obesity and its related diseases are a problem in the U.S. &#8212; but most nutritionists and scientists would agree that that&#8217;s due to overeating unhealthy foods (including, to McDougall&#8217;s credit, excessive fats and oils) and sedentary lifestyle, not &#8220;oil poisoning.&#8221; Your strange assertion that &#8220;No fat is a good fat,&#8221; however, gives me the sense that you&#8217;re more into strange fringe food &#8220;scientists&#8221; than reliable, proven scientific and nutritional research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/comment-page-1/#comment-401412</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=4271#comment-401412</guid>
		<description>As a long time mcdougaller I think you should hear the poster out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long time mcdougaller I think you should hear the poster out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siel</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/comment-page-1/#comment-400659</link>
		<dc:creator>Siel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=4271#comment-400659</guid>
		<description>Peter -- agreed.

Lex -- Your bizarro argument that good old organic olive oil&#039;s worse for you than toxic Teflon does nothing besides perpetuate the angry crazy vegan stereotype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#8212; agreed.</p>
<p>Lex &#8212; Your bizarro argument that good old organic olive oil&#8217;s worse for you than toxic Teflon does nothing besides perpetuate the angry crazy vegan stereotype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/comment-page-1/#comment-400637</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=4271#comment-400637</guid>
		<description>Have you ever heard of anyone diagnosed with Teflon toxicity?  Now how many people do you know who are over weight and suffering from obesity&#039;s ill effects?   Teflon pans are far better for your health than cooking with poisonous fats/oils.  No fat is a good fat.  The fat you eat is the fat you wear.  You&#039;re body stores over 90% of the fats you consume. These free oils/fats increase the hormones in your body like IGF, which spur cancer growth, and not to mention growth of your mid section.  Check out Dr. McDougall&#039;s website for more information on fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever heard of anyone diagnosed with Teflon toxicity?  Now how many people do you know who are over weight and suffering from obesity&#8217;s ill effects?   Teflon pans are far better for your health than cooking with poisonous fats/oils.  No fat is a good fat.  The fat you eat is the fat you wear.  You&#8217;re body stores over 90% of the fats you consume. These free oils/fats increase the hormones in your body like IGF, which spur cancer growth, and not to mention growth of your mid section.  Check out Dr. McDougall&#8217;s website for more information on fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterb</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/is-greenpan-a-safe-alternative-to-toxic-teflon/comment-page-1/#comment-398000</link>
		<dc:creator>peterb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=4271#comment-398000</guid>
		<description>The other aspect here is that non-stick pans aren&#039;t actually any good.  

One good cast-iron skillet, one good (non-non-stick) saucepan, and one good stockpot should be able to handle 99% of your stovetop cooking needs.  If you think you &quot;need&quot; a nonstick pan, that&#039;s a sign that you&#039;re doing it wrong.  Modify the way you use heat, change your technique, and use more fat or a more appropriate fat to reduce the need for nonstick surfaces.  For low to medium heat, olive oil is both healthy and appropriate.  For high heat cooking, almond oil fills the same niche, or safflower oil if you can&#039;t find almond oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other aspect here is that non-stick pans aren&#8217;t actually any good.  </p>
<p>One good cast-iron skillet, one good (non-non-stick) saucepan, and one good stockpot should be able to handle 99% of your stovetop cooking needs.  If you think you &#8220;need&#8221; a nonstick pan, that&#8217;s a sign that you&#8217;re doing it wrong.  Modify the way you use heat, change your technique, and use more fat or a more appropriate fat to reduce the need for nonstick surfaces.  For low to medium heat, olive oil is both healthy and appropriate.  For high heat cooking, almond oil fills the same niche, or safflower oil if you can&#8217;t find almond oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
