<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Join the World&#8217;s Largest Fair Trade Coffee Break tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenlagirl.com/join-the-worlds-largest-fair-trade-coffee-break-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenlagirl.com/join-the-worlds-largest-fair-trade-coffee-break-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Urban environmental lifestyle blog in Los Angeles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:36:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedl</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/join-the-worlds-largest-fair-trade-coffee-break-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-286084</link>
		<dc:creator>tedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/2008/05/09/join-the-worlds-largest-fair-trade-coffee-break-tomorrow/#comment-286084</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve posted a lot of great articles on some of the controversy surrounding Fair Trade before (Geoff Watts interviews, to be precise). Great work there.

But as &quot;green LA girl&quot;, how do you see a program dealing with social and economic issues -- and not environmental issues -- qualifying as &quot;green&quot;?

Seriously, and I&#039;m only being half facetious, shouldn&#039;t they be &quot;brown&quot; or &quot;black&quot;??

People have a frequent misconception blurring the lines of environmental goods and social/economic progressiveness being one and the same. Sometimes they can be at odds with each other, let alone independent.

After all, Fair Trade coffee doesn&#039;t necessarily mean &quot;organic&quot; or ban all use of pesticides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve posted a lot of great articles on some of the controversy surrounding Fair Trade before (Geoff Watts interviews, to be precise). Great work there.</p>
<p>But as &#8220;green LA girl&#8221;, how do you see a program dealing with social and economic issues &#8212; and not environmental issues &#8212; qualifying as &#8220;green&#8221;?</p>
<p>Seriously, and I&#8217;m only being half facetious, shouldn&#8217;t they be &#8220;brown&#8221; or &#8220;black&#8221;??</p>
<p>People have a frequent misconception blurring the lines of environmental goods and social/economic progressiveness being one and the same. Sometimes they can be at odds with each other, let alone independent.</p>
<p>After all, Fair Trade coffee doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean &#8220;organic&#8221; or ban all use of pesticides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

