Comments on: Live blogging Metro’s Subway to the Sea meeting

By: Alek F

Alek F — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:43:24 +0000

I’m very glad BRT options will Not be considered in the future! Finally, common sense has prevailed.
(I’m sure the Bus Riders Union lunatics are furious; they probably wanted buses. LOL Let them “suffer” on our subway. Yeeeeah!)

By: Aaron

Aaron — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:23:38 +0000

Gary,

I stayed through the inanity and did see your comment, and loved it. It’s sad but true.

Text Maniac: Alternatives 2-10 died at various stages of scoping ;p. It really is Alternative 11, and it’s a coincidence that the surviving plans are “1″ and “11.”

By: Gary Kavanagh

Gary Kavanagh — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:03:01 +0000

Hey, I was there as well. I think you missed my two minutes, but I went up and talked about beating car times from Hollywood to Santa Monica during the morning rush on my bicycle, to emphasize how dire the traffic situation is. I hope we see Alternative 11 someday, and as mentioned by others, I hope without parking expansions.

By: N.S.

N.S. — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:39:15 +0000

Yes, I agree. A UCLA Subway stop would be unbelievable. I hope beyond hope that this project finally gets rolling soon..!!

By: Evan

Evan — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:30:02 +0000

A UCLA subway stop would kick major ass.