<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poison perfume: Now less poisonous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenlagirl.com/poison-perfume-now-less-poisonous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenlagirl.com/poison-perfume-now-less-poisonous/</link>
	<description>Urban environmental lifestyle blog in Los Angeles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siel</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/poison-perfume-now-less-poisonous/comment-page-1/#comment-395084</link>
		<dc:creator>Siel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=780#comment-395084</guid>
		<description>Thanks for helping to make this move toward safer cosmetics happen, Stacy --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for helping to make this move toward safer cosmetics happen, Stacy &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://greenlagirl.com/poison-perfume-now-less-poisonous/comment-page-1/#comment-393799</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlagirl.com/?p=780#comment-393799</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Siel! The beauty industry&#039;s top spokesman, John Bailey, told USA Today that he sees &quot;no sign of a trend&quot; that companies are removing phthalates. Well why not? These chemicals are linked to birth defects and reproductive harm, yet some companies continue to put phthalates into their products even though alternatives are available. It&#039;s time for all companies in the $50 billion beauty industry to get on board with the trend of making safer, toxic-free products that consumers want and deserve. 

Thanks for covering this important topic,
Stacy Malkan
Author, &quot;Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry&quot;

www.NotJustaPrettyFace.org

USA Today story: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-12-09-perfume_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Siel! The beauty industry&#8217;s top spokesman, John Bailey, told USA Today that he sees &#8220;no sign of a trend&#8221; that companies are removing phthalates. Well why not? These chemicals are linked to birth defects and reproductive harm, yet some companies continue to put phthalates into their products even though alternatives are available. It&#8217;s time for all companies in the $50 billion beauty industry to get on board with the trend of making safer, toxic-free products that consumers want and deserve. </p>
<p>Thanks for covering this important topic,<br />
Stacy Malkan<br />
Author, &#8220;Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.NotJustaPrettyFace.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.NotJustaPrettyFace.org</a></p>
<p>USA Today story: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-12-09-perfume_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-12-09-perfume_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
