A series that runs every Tuesday, where I ask questions unrelated to the environment, fair trade, or local politics that I’ve been wondering about but haven’t been able to google the answers to. Any advice is appreciated.
If you’re asking what a feed is, you’re missing out. Learn more here.
My feed theory: Syndicate your whole post, damnit. If you only syndicate the first para or so, chances are, I’ll likely read fewer of your posts, and over time, will probably delete you from my feed reader altogether from annoyance.
Which is why I complained to Jeff at Sustainablog when only first part of his post started showing up in my Bloglines. Turns out the snafu occurred inadverdently while Jeff was re-formatting his blog a bit. We’re back to full sustainablog posts — yay!
Anyway — My contention is that — if more hits are what you’re seeking — limiting your feed content will prolly not increase your hits — it may even decrease them. In my opinion, this partial-feed thing may work for major newspapers — and maybe gristmill — but for few single-author blogs…
However, I have not actually tried limiting my syndication to test this theory — and was wondering if anyone else had stats or personal experience trying it…. Have you tried changing your feed from limited content to full content or vice versa? What effect did the change have on your hits?

My feed-reading habit has been to just open up individual articles in new tabs in Safari (there’s gotta be a way to automate that) from the feed view.
One consequence of this is that I’ve started dramatically cutting back the feed view in my reader so it doesn’t matter how much of the article is shown.
But that’s just one reader’s experience.
Comment by don hosek — December 28, 2006 @ 7:11 am
Green RFID Guy kindly sent me a link to some people who tried going from partial to full feeds — an experiment that make these people diehard fans of offering full feeds. The post even has stats and graphs — Thanks for the link, Green RFID Guy!
Comment by Siel — December 28, 2006 @ 7:14 pm